Gendered Language Use In Academic And Professional Settings
Keywords:
gendered language, professional communication, academic discourse, sociolinguistics, discourse analysisAbstract
Gendered language use has become a significant focus in applied linguistics, reflecting how linguistic choices construct, reproduce, or challenge social identities in academic and professional contexts. This study examines patterns of gendered communication in spoken and written discourse within higher education and workplace settings, highlighting differences in lexical choices, politeness strategies, turn-taking, and discourse structuring. Using a qualitative approach, the research analyzes authentic interactional data to identify how male and female speakers navigate authority, collaboration, and relational goals. Findings reveal that gendered patterns are context-dependent, influenced by institutional norms, cultural expectations, and power dynamics, rather than fixed linguistic behavior. The study also shows that awareness of gendered language use has practical implications for professional communication, collaborative teamwork, and academic instruction. By linking sociolinguistic theory with applied research, the study contributes to understanding the intersection of language, gender, and social roles, offering insights for linguists, educators, and practitioners.
References
Cameron, D. (2007). The myth of Mars and Venus: Do men and women really speak different languages? Oxford University Press.
Coates, J. (2013). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, J. (2008). An introduction to sociolinguistics (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2011). Women, men and politeness. Routledge.
Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. Pearson.
Karimova, O. (2025). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POETIC DEVICES: ALLITERATION, ASSONANCE, AND ENJAMBMENT IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK POETRY. QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI, 14, 192–194. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v14i.1161
Karimova, O. (2025). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POETIC DEVICES: ALLITERATION, ASSONANCE, AND ENJAMBMENT IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK POETRY. QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI, 14, 192–194. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v14i.1161
Karimova, O., & Sobirova, N. (2025). MUQIM FRAZEOLOGIK BIRLIKLAR TARJIMASINING O ‘ZIGA XOSLIKLARI. TAMADDUN NURI JURNALI, 1(64), 214-217.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. Harper & Row.
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE.
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. Ballantine Books.
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford University Press.