The Pragmatic And Ideological Implications Of Euphemisms In Political Campaign Language
Abstract
Euphemisms are a strategic component of political language, particularly during election campaigns where image, perception, and persuasion are paramount. This paper examines how euphemistic expressions are pragmatically used to perform speech acts that conceal ideological positions, manipulate voter perceptions, and frame political agendas in a more favorable light. Drawing on speech act theory, pragmatics, and critical discourse analysis, the study explores how euphemisms are employed not just to soften offensive or controversial messages, but to strategically obscure political realities. Through analysis of campaign speeches, slogans, and media messaging, the paper reveals the ideological mechanisms at work behind seemingly innocuous language and discusses its implications for democratic engagement and informed voting.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). *How to Do Things with Words*. Oxford University Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. *Journal of Communication*, 43(4), 51–58.
Fairclough, N. (2003). *Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research*. Routledge.
Lakoff, G. (2004). *Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate*. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Luntz, F. (2007). *Words That Work: It’s Not What You Say, It’s What People Hear*. Hyperion.
Searle, J. R. (1969). *Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language*. Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and Manipulation. *Discourse & Society*, 17(3), 359–383.
Wodak, R. (2015). *The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean*. SAGE.