Rhetorical Functions Of Euphemisms In Crisis Communication By Political Leaders
Abstract
This paper explores the strategic use of euphemisms in political leaders’ crisis communication through the lens of Aristotelian rhetoric. Euphemisms, often dismissed as mere politeness, serve powerful rhetorical functions in shaping public perception during times of national or international crises such as pandemics, wars, or economic downturns. By employing ethos, pathos, and logos, euphemisms are utilized to reduce public panic, deflect responsibility, and reinforce authority. The study draws from rhetorical and crisis communication theories and offers a comparative analysis of political leaders' speeches during various crises, including COVID-19, military interventions, and economic collapses. The findings suggest that euphemistic language plays a central role in constructing politically favorable narratives, often at the expense of transparency. Understanding these rhetorical choices is essential for promoting critical public engagement and ethical communication in governance.
References
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). *Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor*. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, P. (2004). *Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice*. Routledge.
Entman, R. M. (2003). Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. University of Chicago Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003). *Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research*. Routledge.
Lakoff, G. (2004). *Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate*. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (2003). *Communication and Organizational Crisis*. Praeger.
Wodak, R. (2020). *The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean*. SAGE.
Zarefsky, D. (2006). *Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation*. Argumentation, 20(3), 297–309.
