11

An Integrated Methodological Approach To Assessing The Competitiveness Of Small Businesses

Authors

  • Jamoliddin Kambarov

    DSc, Associate Professor, Kokand University
    Author
  • Gulxon Melibayeva

    Independent researcher, Kokand university
    Author

Keywords:

Small business competitiveness; integrated methodology; strategic assessment; internal capabilities; external environment; innovation; business strategy; performance evaluation.

Abstract

Traditional methods of evaluating competitiveness often fail to capture the complex, multidimensional nature of small business operations. This study proposes an integrated methodological approach that combines internal capabilities, external environment factors, and strategic orientation to provide a holistic assessment of competitiveness in small businesses. The framework uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative indicators—such as human capital, innovation, financial health, market dynamics, and strategic adaptability—to generate a nuanced diagnostic tool. A sample evaluation table demonstrates how the framework can be used to assess strengths and identify areas for improvement. This approach supports small business owners, policymakers, and consultants in crafting targeted strategies for sustainable growth and resilience. Ultimately, the integrated assessment model offers a practical and flexible pathway to understanding and enhancing small business competitiveness in a dynamic business environment.

References

Bamiatzi, V. C., Bozos, K., Cavusgil, S. T., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016). Revisiting the firm, industry, and country effects on profitability under recessionary and expansion periods: A multilevel analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1448–1471. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2400

Gunasekaran, A., Rai, B. K., & Griffin, M. (2017). Resilience and competitiveness of small and medium size enterprises: An empirical research. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 6684–6705. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1343326

De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., & Cassia, L. (2018). Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(S1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12333

Oura, M. M., Zilber, S. N., & Lopes, E. L. (2016). Innovation capacity, international experience and export performance of SMEs in Brazil. International Business Review, 25(4), 921–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.12.002

Dabić, M., Ortiz‐De‐Urbina‐Criado, M., & Romero‐Martínez, A. M. (2020). Human resource management in entrepreneurial firms: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(4), 629–656. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2019-0113

Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Kraus, S. (2019). Entrepreneurship research: Mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Review of Managerial Science, 13, 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0242-3

Downloads

Published

2025-07-13

How to Cite

Kambarov, J., & Melibayeva, G. (2025). An Integrated Methodological Approach To Assessing The Competitiveness Of Small Businesses. International Conference on Global Trends and Innovations in Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1), 142-145. https://www.tlepub.org/index.php/2/article/view/90