Integration of national and modern experiences in improving reading literacy in primary grades
Keywords:
Primary education, Reading literacy, National experience, Modern methods, IMRAD, Integration, Critical thinking, PISA.Abstract
This scientific article considers the urgent problem of improving the level of reading literacy of students at the primary education stage, substantiating the scientific and practical importance of combining national pedagogical traditions with internationally recognized modern approaches. The focus of the research is on creating synergy between national experience (for example, the "teacher-student" tradition, methods of teaching classical literature) and modern experience (for example, international assessment criteria such as PISA, PIRLS, integration of digital literacy, interactive methods of developing understanding). The article theoretically and practically substantiates the fact that by combining these two approaches, it is possible to develop not only reading speed and technique, but also the skills of deep understanding of the text, critical thinking and application of the acquired knowledge to real-life situations. The research methodology is based on a combination of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods, which allows testing the effectiveness of the integration model. The results show that the integrated approach leads to significant positive changes in the level of students' understanding of the text compared to traditional methods. This work serves to solve the task facing the education system of achieving world standards while maintaining national identity.
References
Adams, M. J. (2011). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academies Press.
Avloniy, A. (1913). Turkiy Guliston yoxud Axloq. (Qayta nashrlar).
Beruniy, A. R. (Taxminan 1000-yillar). O‘tmish avlodlardan qolgan yodgorliklar. (Turli nashrlar).
Mahmudov, M. (2018). Milliy pedagogika tarixi va taraqqiyoti. Toshkent: Yangi Asr Avlodi.
Usmonova, N. (2020). O‘zbek maktablarida o‘qish savodxonligini shakllantirish muammolari. Xalq ta’limi, (4), 45-51.
Grant, N. (1964). Soviet education. Penguin Books.
Dearden, R. F. (1984). Theory and practice in education. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 1-17). International Reading Association.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Duffy, G. G. (2009). Explaining reading: A resource for teaching reading. Guilford Press.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2015). Digital literacies: Changing practices. Peter Lang.
Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of prior knowledge, self-efficacy, and reading strategy use. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352–395.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Sleeter, C. E. (2012). Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education, 47(3), 562–584.
Tan, J. (2017). Singapore's education journey: From common curriculum to diversified pathways. Journal of Educational Change, 18(2), 177-195.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press.
Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.
Gurova, N. (2021). The role of folklore in developing reading literacy in primary school students. European Journal of Education, 54(1), 11-20.
Mo‘minov, I. (2022). O‘zbek maktablarida o‘qish savodxonligi va tanqidiy fikrlash integratsiyasi. Ta'lim va innovatsiya jurnali, 3(1), 120-135.
Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning: Metacognition. Routledge. (Turli tillardagi nashrlari).
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Both journal and authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.